If the abstract of this paper leaves the reader rather puzzled, a rapid glimpse to the text would suggest a summary of historical investigation on the Ettore Majorana case. Instead a more detailed reading leads the amused reader to a very deep question: "What drug is this guy in?" The dissapearance of Majorana has always made people very curious, particularly for a number of circumstances which added mistery to the case. Historians have been left with very few clues and the lack of information allowed many people (novelists and physicists) to speculate quite a lot. Certainly some of the hypothesis that have been suggested, such as Majorana being still alive (at least 10-30 yrs ago) retired in a cloister (Sciascia in "Il caso Majorana" 1975), or living in Argentina (Recami in "Il caso Majorana" 1987) remain very "romantic". (By the way Majorana would turn 100 on next August 5th). Unfortunately these conclusions do not seem to have strong ground. An interesting study has been presented by Bruno Russo in his book "Ettore Maiorana (Un giorno di Marzo)". A book extremely well written that offers a reliable historical and psycological analysis of the context in which Majorana's life took place. It provides an insight on the existential drama of Majorana as man and scientist. Russo particularly emphasizes Majorana's interest for Schopenhauer's philosophy. In this perspective his decision to isolate himself from the rest of the Panisperna group and eventually of taking his life may suggest a more plausible explanation than previous speculations. It is unfortunate that most of these studies are limited to Italian readers, surely broader audiences remain interested on the case. Nevertheless we should always remember that Majorana's legacy goes very much beyond the vicissitudes of his life. His contributions to Physics remains relevant even today and it is really unfortunate that in the centenary of his birth few have remembered him.