Ulrich said on his blog: "P.S. Seen in this light, the questions initially asked by Jaffe appear pretty vacuous, don’t they?" Not if you click-on the link that I provided, since it very simply explains “why things that “occupy space” are made of finite numbers of objects that don’t”. As well as the anthropic relevance to all of this, but without all the spookey fantasy Mathifizixes that stringers luv so much. The term, "Vacuous", may still be relevant tho!... ;)