Could you explain why Bohmian mechanics is not, in your view, such a more coherent interpretation of QM? http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/qm-bohm/ http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0112008 First and not least, the Bohm interpretation makes it easy to distinguish the experimental fact "action at a distance" from the Copenhagen lingo "collapse of the wave function". It seems that the most common reasons for disliking Bohmian mechanics have been or are: 1. misunderstanding the EPR-Bell argument - J.Bricmont "What is the meaning of the wave function" http://www.dogma.lu/pdf/JB-wave_function.pdf - J.S.Bell "Speakable and Unspeakable in QM" 2. a precipitate application of Occam's razor -- looking at Bohmian particle trajectories as an unnecessary "complication" because it only serves to "restore a sense of sanity to the whole affair". - http://www.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de/~bohmmech/BohmHome/weingold.html